Type-Specific Identifier Generation
In the previous article, Global Identifier generation conventions were introduced. Any customization made by using those conventions changes the behavior for all stored entities. Now we will show how to override the default ID generation in a more granular way, for particular types of entities.
To override default document identifier generation algorithms, you can register custom conventions per an entity type. You can include your own identifier generation logic.
RegisterIdConvention
public <TEntity> DocumentConventions registerIdConvention(Class<TEntity> clazz, BiFunction<String, TEntity, String> function);
Parameters | ||
---|---|---|
function | BiFunction<String, TEntity, String> | Identifier generation function that supplies a result for given database name (String ) and entity object (TEntity ). |
Return Value | |
---|---|
DocumentConventions | Current DocumentConventions instance. |
Database name parameter
The database name parameter is passed to the register convention methods to allow users to make Id generation decision per database.
Example
Let's say that you want to use semantic identifiers for Employee
objects. Instead of employee/[identity]
you want to have identifiers like employees/[lastName]/[firstName]
(for the sake of simplicity, let us not consider the uniqueness of such identifiers). What you need to do is to create the convention that will combine the employee
prefix, LastName
and FirstName
properties of an employee.
store.getConventions().registerIdConvention(Employee.class,
(dbName, employee) ->
String.format("employees/%s/%s", employee.getLastName(), employee.getFirstName()));
Now, when you store a new entity:
try (IDocumentSession session = store.openSession()) {
Employee employee = new Employee();
employee.setFirstName("James");
employee.setLastName("Bond");
session.store(employee);
session.saveChanges();
}
the client will associate the employees/Bond/James
identifier with it.
Inheritance
Registered conventions are inheritance-aware so all types that can be assigned from registered type will fall into that convention according to inheritance-hierarchy tree.
Example
If we create a new class EmployeeManager
that will derive from our Employee
class and keep the convention registered in the last example, both types will use the following:
try (IDocumentSession session = store.openSession()) {
Employee adam = new Employee();
adam.setFirstName("Adam");
adam.setLastName("Smith");
session.store(adam); // employees/Smith/Adam
EmployeeManager david = new EmployeeManager();
david.setFirstName("David");
david.setLastName("Jones");
session.store(david); // employees/Jones/David
session.saveChanges();
}
If we register two conventions, one for Employee
and the second for EmployeeManager
then they will be picked for their specific types.
store.getConventions().registerIdConvention(Employee.class,
(dbName, employee) ->
String.format("employees/%s/%s", employee.getLastName(), employee.getFirstName())
);
store.getConventions().registerIdConvention(EmployeeManager.class,
(dbName, employee) ->
String.format("managers/%s/%s", employee.getLastName(), employee.getFirstName())
);
try (IDocumentSession session = store.openSession()) {
Employee adam = new Employee();
adam.setFirstName("Adam");
adam.setLastName("Smith");
session.store(adam); // employees/Smith/AdamReadBalanceBehavior
EmployeeManager david = new EmployeeManager();
david.setFirstName("David");
david.setLastName("Jones");
session.store(david); // managers/Jones/David
session.saveChanges();
}